Hello, and thanks to Eugene for making the Genie scout, it's brilliant.
Just downloaded the new version and was browsing some ratings, when I noticed that Bordeaux' Ulrich Rame is rated higher than Carasso. This seemed strange, so I checked their respective ratings one by one, and the rating coefficients in Genie scout, and can't explain the results.
Carasso vs Rame: Aerial +2, Command of Area +1, Communication =, Eccentricity +4, First Touch -4, Free Kick Taking +4, Handling +1, Kicking +2, One on Ones =, Penalty taking +7, Reflexes +2, Rushing Out -3, Punching +7, Throwing +3, Aggression +5, Anticipation -1, Bravery =, Composure +1, Concentration +1, Creativity =, Decisions +2, Determination +2, Flair +4, Influence -4, Off the Ball +1, Positioning =, Acceleration +5, Agility +3, Balance =, Jumping =, Natural Fitness +1, Pace +6, Stamina +2, Strength =, Consistency +1, Dirtiness +5, Important Matches +2, Injury Proneness +3, Versatility =, Adaptability -1, Ambition +2, Controversy +1, Loyalty -4, Pressure =, Professionalism -3, Sportsmanship -3, Temperament -2. CA +18 (153 vs 135).
The overall ratings are Rame 75.43% and Carasso 71.42%. Looking at the default rating coefficients this doesn't seem right, any idea what's going on? Has anyone else noticed strange results like this?
I've included every single attribute and based on the above Carasso should be more highly rated (his only significant negatives are +4 eccentricity and +7 punching, but he has +18 CA and higher or equal rating in the highly weighed goalkeeping attributes like reflexes and handling), their height is the same, the only significant difference is footedness (Carasso can only use his right foot) so I am really stumped. I even tried changing the rating coefficient for eccentricity to 0, but still Rame appears better. Any idea what (if anything) is wrong?
Just downloaded the new version and was browsing some ratings, when I noticed that Bordeaux' Ulrich Rame is rated higher than Carasso. This seemed strange, so I checked their respective ratings one by one, and the rating coefficients in Genie scout, and can't explain the results.
Carasso vs Rame: Aerial +2, Command of Area +1, Communication =, Eccentricity +4, First Touch -4, Free Kick Taking +4, Handling +1, Kicking +2, One on Ones =, Penalty taking +7, Reflexes +2, Rushing Out -3, Punching +7, Throwing +3, Aggression +5, Anticipation -1, Bravery =, Composure +1, Concentration +1, Creativity =, Decisions +2, Determination +2, Flair +4, Influence -4, Off the Ball +1, Positioning =, Acceleration +5, Agility +3, Balance =, Jumping =, Natural Fitness +1, Pace +6, Stamina +2, Strength =, Consistency +1, Dirtiness +5, Important Matches +2, Injury Proneness +3, Versatility =, Adaptability -1, Ambition +2, Controversy +1, Loyalty -4, Pressure =, Professionalism -3, Sportsmanship -3, Temperament -2. CA +18 (153 vs 135).
The overall ratings are Rame 75.43% and Carasso 71.42%. Looking at the default rating coefficients this doesn't seem right, any idea what's going on? Has anyone else noticed strange results like this?
I've included every single attribute and based on the above Carasso should be more highly rated (his only significant negatives are +4 eccentricity and +7 punching, but he has +18 CA and higher or equal rating in the highly weighed goalkeeping attributes like reflexes and handling), their height is the same, the only significant difference is footedness (Carasso can only use his right foot) so I am really stumped. I even tried changing the rating coefficient for eccentricity to 0, but still Rame appears better. Any idea what (if anything) is wrong?
