well with walcott u can see that 1-2 games does really well. then 1 game he will be totally off.
some people at times think he is good because at times he can make a run with the ball with his pace and it makes him shine a bit. but on many occasions he can really be ineffective. But some games he can really be up there and do things well.
i think he will always be inconsistent because he doesnt have a lot different skills.
i mean if u take one of the best players in the world in history: Zidane.
attackingly he could do everything, run with the ball go past a few, good shots, good finishing, great vision and passing, and even good in the air
but walcott doesnt have all that. he has more physical than mental. I mean he can run past a few players score a few goals, and time to time can deliver decent crosses. But he isnt much more than that to be honest. But IM NOT SAYING HE IS NOT GOOD.
some people at times think he is good because at times he can make a run with the ball with his pace and it makes him shine a bit. but on many occasions he can really be ineffective. But some games he can really be up there and do things well.
i think he will always be inconsistent because he doesnt have a lot different skills.
i mean if u take one of the best players in the world in history: Zidane.
attackingly he could do everything, run with the ball go past a few, good shots, good finishing, great vision and passing, and even good in the air
but walcott doesnt have all that. he has more physical than mental. I mean he can run past a few players score a few goals, and time to time can deliver decent crosses. But he isnt much more than that to be honest. But IM NOT SAYING HE IS NOT GOOD.
