15 May 21
It was nearly a week later, and I was still reeling from the shock. The meeting wasn’t at all what I had expected it to be. It wasn’t The Apprentice either, but make no mistake, I had been fired.
After assembling the best young talent that we could attract, slashing the costs AND gaining promotion, I felt numb. I hadn’t even had a chance to sample the talent from the academy where I had spent my own money.
Mr Parkinson had stated a number of factors, one of which was the lack of financial control I was showing. I thought I had done a fairly decent job of ensuring over the next four years, while we climbed to the Premiership, minimal buying and selling would occur. Within four years, the players in the team now – the likes of Simm, Holmes, Navarro, would be at the peak of their powers, ready for the fresh challenge of the EPL, and ready to help the next set of talented youngsters make the step up. I felt it was the lack of financial prudence and the salary levels prior to my tenure which has set the tone for the financial state of the club. My view of the club was to have a small first team of talented young players, and loan potential mentors for them, and the loaner’s club expense. That way, I am still getting the benefit of the older player’s experience, without having to pay for it.
I had a ten year plan which had very clear dates about when to buy and sell players and the qualities we should be looking for, but none of that mattered now.
So the finances were definitely a factor.
The other factor which made this decision for the Board fairly easy was the apparent lack of cohesion in the club. They pointed to the number of players I had bought in, the number of players I had sold, and the number of players that were leaving in the next window. I don’t think that they were impressed that I had effectively changed the entire roster in five months, save I think two players in the first team roster, Rios (who was the only descent player there) and Agnew (who was the best player I could hope for on the money I was paying him). Add to that, I had completely changed the back office staff, better staff for less money, but drastic change nonetheless. One might say in hindsight, too drastic for the Board to accept.
Before closing the meeting, they also mentioned the cases of Stevenson and Barton. I now believe that both these cases were distractions for them. In the case of Stevenson, they asked me why I didn’t just deal with him, as he is now hanging around, and causing problems for everyone. If I had offered compensation, sure it may had have been more of a burden on the club, but what cost would I attach to him now, having been sat in the Boardroom, taking questions? I take from that that the Board, and rightly so, expected me to “deal” with the Stevenson issue without the need for them to become involved. And now they were. FML.
With the case of Barton, the Board had a very different view to mine. They were adamant that because he was a fan favourite and drew the crowds, there was absolutely no way they were going to let me sell him. So overpaid or not, he is the lynchpin which they see the team being built around. There is no argument from me that he is a class act; I just feel that he doesn’t represent value for money, and that far better players could be recruited. I hear myself thinking “you should have accepted the 1.6M offer, you stupid idiot.” If I had sold him for 1.6M, Jackson (300K) Cross (100K) and Seddon (400K) would have all be funded from the sale proceed. I had three players who are younger,more talented and cheaper than Jimmy Barton coming to play for us, but the Board would not hear of it.
Guess that is why I am now unemployed.
I feel a great deal of personal satisfaction having developed a team of youngsters who I believe will challenge for the EPL title within seven years. I do believe I have been given a rough deal by the Board, and in some senses, as if I have been rammed up the……., which during World War II, was akin to being sent to the Russian Front. Now there is an idea……..
It was nearly a week later, and I was still reeling from the shock. The meeting wasn’t at all what I had expected it to be. It wasn’t The Apprentice either, but make no mistake, I had been fired.
After assembling the best young talent that we could attract, slashing the costs AND gaining promotion, I felt numb. I hadn’t even had a chance to sample the talent from the academy where I had spent my own money.
Mr Parkinson had stated a number of factors, one of which was the lack of financial control I was showing. I thought I had done a fairly decent job of ensuring over the next four years, while we climbed to the Premiership, minimal buying and selling would occur. Within four years, the players in the team now – the likes of Simm, Holmes, Navarro, would be at the peak of their powers, ready for the fresh challenge of the EPL, and ready to help the next set of talented youngsters make the step up. I felt it was the lack of financial prudence and the salary levels prior to my tenure which has set the tone for the financial state of the club. My view of the club was to have a small first team of talented young players, and loan potential mentors for them, and the loaner’s club expense. That way, I am still getting the benefit of the older player’s experience, without having to pay for it.
I had a ten year plan which had very clear dates about when to buy and sell players and the qualities we should be looking for, but none of that mattered now.
So the finances were definitely a factor.
The other factor which made this decision for the Board fairly easy was the apparent lack of cohesion in the club. They pointed to the number of players I had bought in, the number of players I had sold, and the number of players that were leaving in the next window. I don’t think that they were impressed that I had effectively changed the entire roster in five months, save I think two players in the first team roster, Rios (who was the only descent player there) and Agnew (who was the best player I could hope for on the money I was paying him). Add to that, I had completely changed the back office staff, better staff for less money, but drastic change nonetheless. One might say in hindsight, too drastic for the Board to accept.
Before closing the meeting, they also mentioned the cases of Stevenson and Barton. I now believe that both these cases were distractions for them. In the case of Stevenson, they asked me why I didn’t just deal with him, as he is now hanging around, and causing problems for everyone. If I had offered compensation, sure it may had have been more of a burden on the club, but what cost would I attach to him now, having been sat in the Boardroom, taking questions? I take from that that the Board, and rightly so, expected me to “deal” with the Stevenson issue without the need for them to become involved. And now they were. FML.
With the case of Barton, the Board had a very different view to mine. They were adamant that because he was a fan favourite and drew the crowds, there was absolutely no way they were going to let me sell him. So overpaid or not, he is the lynchpin which they see the team being built around. There is no argument from me that he is a class act; I just feel that he doesn’t represent value for money, and that far better players could be recruited. I hear myself thinking “you should have accepted the 1.6M offer, you stupid idiot.” If I had sold him for 1.6M, Jackson (300K) Cross (100K) and Seddon (400K) would have all be funded from the sale proceed. I had three players who are younger,more talented and cheaper than Jimmy Barton coming to play for us, but the Board would not hear of it.
Guess that is why I am now unemployed.
I feel a great deal of personal satisfaction having developed a team of youngsters who I believe will challenge for the EPL title within seven years. I do believe I have been given a rough deal by the Board, and in some senses, as if I have been rammed up the……., which during World War II, was akin to being sent to the Russian Front. Now there is an idea……..