I've been using Genie scout extensively while playing. I just can't play without it.
I've noticed that some 120 or 130 or 140 potential ability players, peaked, have better role ratings than higher potential ability players.
For example I had a 140 pa left winger with 20 on pace acceleration which even though started at 68% winger rating, after a few seasons of magnificent performances and hard training it climbed high to 82% winger rating, one of the best players in the world for that role with I repeat only 140 pa.
Same happened with a 140 pa defender.
I was thinking if training and performances are the signature of player's development. And that any specialised medium potential ability player could become a world class player, then what should we look for in players?
My guess is mental traits, for example proffesionalism, or important matches.
The questions are
1) has anyone else noticed my low PA - best player in the world theory?
2) if 1) is correct what do you look at on the player you are going to develop to be the next star?
I've noticed that some 120 or 130 or 140 potential ability players, peaked, have better role ratings than higher potential ability players.
For example I had a 140 pa left winger with 20 on pace acceleration which even though started at 68% winger rating, after a few seasons of magnificent performances and hard training it climbed high to 82% winger rating, one of the best players in the world for that role with I repeat only 140 pa.
Same happened with a 140 pa defender.
I was thinking if training and performances are the signature of player's development. And that any specialised medium potential ability player could become a world class player, then what should we look for in players?
My guess is mental traits, for example proffesionalism, or important matches.
The questions are
1) has anyone else noticed my low PA - best player in the world theory?
2) if 1) is correct what do you look at on the player you are going to develop to be the next star?