Firstly, I apologise if this post is in the wrong section, I am a new member.
I am unsure which is more important; CA or a player's role rating. For example, on genie scout Marcelo (Madrid LB) has a CA of 163, which is considered to be a "good rating for the senior team." However, his actual rating in the full back role is relatively poor at 70%.
Another example would be Arbeloa who has a CA of around 130, which is considered "average for the senior team." Despite this, his rating at full back is very high (87%).
Please could anyone provide their input on this. Thank you.
I am unsure which is more important; CA or a player's role rating. For example, on genie scout Marcelo (Madrid LB) has a CA of 163, which is considered to be a "good rating for the senior team." However, his actual rating in the full back role is relatively poor at 70%.
Another example would be Arbeloa who has a CA of around 130, which is considered "average for the senior team." Despite this, his rating at full back is very high (87%).
Please could anyone provide their input on this. Thank you.