A BBC report last season found that, on an average weekend, only about one in three starting Premier League footballers are English, so why do those squeezed out at home not try their luck abroad?Source: http://www.bbc.co.uk/dna/606/A43179212
It is a question I put to former Chelsea, Tottenham and England coach Glenn Hoddle, who is trying to address the problem with his new academy in southern Spain for players who have been released at a young age by professional clubs.
"I don't think we work on technique as much as we should do," Hoddle said.
"I think it goes down to eight, nine and 10-year-olds. Frankly, I don't think players in England play with their heads up as they do abroad.
"Continental players see a picture quicker than English players and if have that and you have better technique, then you are going to have an advantage.
"At those young ages, where they are like sponges and can take things in, I don't think we coach enough, teaching them to play with your head up so they can do the next thing.
"My experience of coaching in England is that in many cases the first thought is of how tall and strong players are and whether they can get box-to-box.
"If that is the priority, the smaller players with better techniques can get left aside and that's a conundrum we find ourselves with."
But what do you think? Are English footballers simply not technically good enough to interest top European clubs, or are there other more important reasons for the seeming reluctance to travel?
Is it a language or cultural barrier, or has the money on offer in the Premier League served to kill any ambition of playing abroad?
What's the answer and is there a solution?
what do you think is the problem?