Its nearly Olympics time in london but does the football mean anything in the world of football and right after Euro2012. The United kingdom side looks set to be a English/Welsh side and without the ledgend that is David Bechham. Was it right not to include the lad? - I think so. I think that the football is a very good chance for the young players to shine but perhaps allowing some oldies is a bad idea? I do not think the Olympics football is important in the world of football but should be used to give the young ones a chance of tournament experience.
As far as I am concerned Beckham has been stitched right up. He has been massively involved with theand hugely influential in the bid and build up too the Olympics and then for Pearce to turn round and say he wasn't going to pick him is disgraceful.
Personally I wouldn't be to fussed about how far we get in the Olympic Football Tournament, I mean does it REALLY need to be taken that seriously, it'd be great to see how the youngsters get on in the tournament but truth be told the only reason i'd of wanted to watch most matches was to see Beckham play.