Hello,
I am using Genie Scout 26g and I have noticed a consistent discrepancy when it comes to wide players / wingers.
The issue is that the player’s general rating, such as Best Potential Rating or the AML/AMR rating, is often higher than the rating shown when I click into the player profile and review the specific role ratings for that position.
For example, a player may be listed as 87% as a winger, but when I open the player and check his roles on that position, his best winger role may only be rated around 81–82%. This is despite the player having 20 for positional familiarity/suitability in that position.
This was not the case in previous versions of Genie Scout. There seems to be a significant mismatch between the general rating and the role rating, and in most cases the role rating is noticeably lower once I open the player’s profile. This appears to affect wingers in particular.
Could you please check whether this is a bug or an intended change?
I am using Genie Scout 26g and I have noticed a consistent discrepancy when it comes to wide players / wingers.
The issue is that the player’s general rating, such as Best Potential Rating or the AML/AMR rating, is often higher than the rating shown when I click into the player profile and review the specific role ratings for that position.
For example, a player may be listed as 87% as a winger, but when I open the player and check his roles on that position, his best winger role may only be rated around 81–82%. This is despite the player having 20 for positional familiarity/suitability in that position.
This was not the case in previous versions of Genie Scout. There seems to be a significant mismatch between the general rating and the role rating, and in most cases the role rating is noticeably lower once I open the player’s profile. This appears to affect wingers in particular.
Could you please check whether this is a bug or an intended change?
