March: Loan dealings...
Damn that result against Rochdale! It has definitely ruined what would have been a perfect strip of green; however, it hasn’t damaged my spirits and I am continuing to enjoy my time with Oldham Athletic thoroughly. The results in my opinion speak for themselves so I thought I would use this update, as I have done recently, to discuss a particular topic. My chosen topic for this update is...the loan market.
Now I will be honest; if it wasn’t for the likes of David Brooks, Angelino and Reuben Noble-Lazarus (who has turned out to be a great loanee) we probably wouldn’t be in the position that we find ourselves with one month to go. With a club like Oldham, they are not blessed with an endless pot of money like other clubs; the fans probably dream of a Sheikh coming in and bringing his fortune with him. Unfortunately that isn’t to be; well not at the minute and it is something you see at the majority of clubs in the lower leagues of football. The majority of the Championship sides have experienced Premier League football so benefit from parachute payments. Oldham has never been at those dizzy heights so have to rely on sponsorship, attendances and any TV money that comes in.
In game, the club is £427k in the red (no doing of mine) so the board of directors are as stingy as the ones at Boston United.. The Oldham board simply cannot afford to give me any funds and I have to respect that but it does mean that a club likes ours has to seek players on the loan market and look to bring them in for no monthly fee and as little of the wages being paid. Thankfully, Lee Johnson, the man I took over from, did so and brought in some quality players who have contributed a lot to our success this season. On a personal level, in-game, I am made up with the loanees that have graced our pitch this season and I will be looking to sign some on a permanent deal if possible or at least bring them back on loan next season.
Now the debate is whether this is real success or whether it is the success of other clubs? There was many an argument on radio phone in shows (which I listen to frequently) as to whether Watford deserved any success since they signed a few players from Italy. They were quality players and contributed a lot to the club during their time there. The other side of the debate was that it was smart business by the club’s owners to bring in players from the club they owned in Italy. Why pay for someone on a permanent deal when you can loan them in, very more than half the cost and they can develop as a player while guiding the club to success? To me it makes perfect sense with the only issue being that some players can be reluctant to join a club of a lower stature. This can ultimately limit the quality of the players who can be brought in. A further issue is that if you bring in a player on loan, simply as a backup player, they aren’t going to want to stick around and you’re bound to get grief from their parent club.
Whichever side of the fence I decide to sit on, you won’t find me complaining at all if David Brooks or another loanee steps up and scores me the winner that gets the club into the play-offs. You may have differing opinions on the loan system and I would love to read them.
Debate away!
Player of the Month – David Brooks